This section describes the insights available for each chart on the Organization (Beta) level. These include detailed information behind each chart, helping you understand the data and the metrics being displayed.

Overview

Charts are individual components on your dashboard that provide specific insights into your data. Each chart is designed to give you a quick, visual understanding of a particular aspect of your engineers productivity.

Once you enable the metrics on the Repositories page, our tool and algorithm will process the essential data related to Organization’s productivity.

The results will be displayed as Effective Output Units in graphs. These units represent the estimated values derived from the data we retrieved from commits.

Data shown in dashboards excludes contributors and commits that fall below a minimum average number of commits per month by contributor across all repositories over the entire time period. The default threshold is set to 5 commits per month, but this can be customized in the Settings >> Organization section under Chart Settings.

Customizing Charts

All charts can be customized to suit your specific needs. Click the “Filters” button in the top-right corner of the Dashboards to access customization options. Note that you need to press the “Apply” button to apply the selected filters.

For more information about filters, please visit the Dashboards page.

Additionally, you can compare the current period with the previous one by turning on the toggle, allowing for a clearer analysis of trends and progress over time.

Charts Explained

Effective Output

Overview: This line chart displays the organization’s Effective Output over time, measured in output units. It includes both New Functionality and Refactored Functionality and can be viewed by day, week, month, quarter, or year.

The Effective Output graph visually represents the total productive output of the organization over time, measured in output units. It combines two key components:

  • New Functionality – Code that introduces brand-new features.

  • Refactored Functionality – Improvements or modifications made to existing functionality that was originally deployed more than three weeks ago.

By tracking these two elements, the graph provides insight into how the organization balances innovation with ongoing improvements. A rising trend indicates increasing productivity, while fluctuations may reflect shifts in priorities, technical debt reduction, or process optimizations. This visualization helps teams assess their development efficiency and maintain a balance between building new features and refining existing ones.

Effective Output per Contributor

Overview: This line chart displays the Effective Output per Contributor over time, measured in output units. It includes both New Functionality and Refactored Functionality and can be viewed by day, week, month, quarter, or year.

The Effective Output per Contributor graph measures the total productive output of entire organization per contributor over time, expressed in output units. It consists of two key components:

  • New Functionality – Code that introduces brand-new features.

  • Refactored Functionality – Improvements or modifications made to existing functionality that was originally deployed more than three weeks ago.

This chart provides insight into how output is distributed across contributors within the organization. A median engineer typically delivers 5–20 output units per month, helping to set benchmarks for productivity. Trends over time can highlight team efficiency, workload distribution, and areas for potential improvement.

Output Breakdown

Overview: This bar chart displays the engineering output breakdown by contribution type over a specified period, grouped by day, week, month, quarter, or year. It categorizes output into Added, Removed, Reworked, and Refactored functionality.

The Output Breakdown graph categorizes engineering output based on the type of contribution, providing a detailed view of how work is distributed. The four key contribution types are:

  • Added – New functionality introduced to the codebase.

  • Removed – Functionality that has been deleted.

  • Reworked – Changes made within 3 weeks of the original release.

  • Refactored – Changes made after 3 weeks of the original release.

This breakdown helps teams analyze development patterns, track the balance between innovation and maintenance, and identify trends in engineering effort over time.

Team Monthly Average Output Breakdown

Overview: This bar chart displays the monthly average engineering output per team, categorized by contribution type. Output is averaged per contributor, allowing for direct comparison across teams of different sizes.

The Team Monthly Average Output Breakdown graph displays the average monthly engineering output per team, categorized by contribution type. It includes:

  • Added – New functionality introduced.

  • Removed – Functionality that has been deleted.

  • Reworked – Changes made within 3 weeks of release.

  • Refactored – Changes made after 3 weeks of release.

Output values are averaged per contributor, enabling direct comparisons across teams of different sizes. This graph helps assess productivity trends, team efficiency, and the distribution of engineering efforts.

Waste Ratio

Overview: This line chart displays the Waste Ratio, showing the proportion of output that has been removed, reworked, or refactored.

The Waste Ratio graph measures the proportion of output that has been removed, reworked, or refactored relative to the total output. A lower value is better, indicating more efficient and productive engineering work.

The waste ratio can never be lower than 1, and values below zero (deletions) are not shown. Deletions are tracked and visualized in other charts within the dashboard.

This chart helps identify inefficiencies and areas for improvement in the development process.

Team Waste Ratio

Overview: This bar chart displays the Waste Ratio per team, showing the proportion of output that has been removed, reworked, or refactored. A lower value indicates more efficient output, with values not falling below 1.

The Team Waste Ratio graph measures the proportion of output that has been removed, reworked, or refactored for each team. A lower value is better, reflecting higher efficiency and less unnecessary modification.

The waste ratio can never be lower than 1, as this represents the minimum threshold for output removal or changes.

This chart allows for comparison of waste ratios across teams, helping to identify areas for process improvement.

Total Output Breakdown

Overview: This bar chart displays the total output breakdown for the analyzed period, categorized by Added, Removed, Reworked, and Refactored functionality. It highlights the distribution of engineering efforts across different contribution types.

The Total Output Breakdown graph provides a detailed view of the overall output during the analyzed period, categorized by contribution type:

  • Added – New functionality introduced.

  • Removed – Functionality that has been deleted.

  • Reworked – Changes made within 3 weeks of release.

  • Refactored – Changes made after 3 weeks of release.

This breakdown helps to understand the distribution of engineering efforts, providing insights into innovation, maintenance, and technical debt management across the organization.

Active Contributors

Overview: This line chart displays the absolute number of active contributors—those who were committing to the codebase—over a specified period, grouped by day, week, month, quarter, or year.

The Active Contributors graph shows the number of contributors who have actively made commits to the codebase during each time period. It provides insight into team engagement and the distribution of contributions, helping to assess the level of participation over time.

Top Repositories by Contribution

Overview: This bar chart ranks repositories by contribution in the analyzed period, based on several factors. It highlights the most active and impactful repositories.

The Top Repositories by Contribution graph presents a ranked list of repositories that received contributions during the analyzed period.

Repositories are ranked based on several factors, including technology used, effective output, total output, size increase, and waste ratio.

This chart provides insights into which repositories saw the most activity and highlights areas of focus, efficiency, and growth across the organization’s codebase.

Effective Output Heatmap

Overview: This heatmap displays the effective output of each team over time, using color gradients to highlight productivity trends and fluctuations across the analyzed period.

The Effective Output Heatmap visualizes the effective output of each team over time, providing a clear view of productivity trends. It uses color gradients to highlight periods of high and low output, helping to identify patterns in team performance and areas for improvement.

This chart allows for easy comparison across teams, showing how output fluctuates throughout the analyzed period.

Commits Heatmap

Overview: The table chart presents a detailed overview of total commits made by team(s) over the selected period, showing absolute counts and sums for each contributor as well as totals for all selected team(s). Each row represents a different team, showing the total commit estimates for that team.

The Commits Heatmap visualizes the number of commits made by each team over time, using color gradients to highlight contribution trends. This chart provides insights into team activity, showing periods of high and low commitment to the codebase, and helping to identify patterns in contribution frequency across different teams.

Please note that you may notice some periods with missing data in the User Interface. This occurs when there are no commits during the selected period and with the applied filters.

Active Contributors Heatmap

Overview: The table chart presents a detailed overview of total active contributors over the selected period. Each row represents a different team, showing the total contributors estimates for that team.

The Active Contributors Heatmap visualizes the number of active contributors per team over time, using color gradients to highlight trends in team size, helping to identify periods of growth or reduction in team size across teams. It provides insights into the evolution of team composition over the analyzed period.

Contact us at support@p10y.com.